<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disgruntled Drivers Responsible for UK Letter Bombs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud "non-killer motorist" Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28637</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud "non-killer motorist" Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28637</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure others are taking aim at other type of cameras.

&quot;Dangerous&quot; is a relative term.  Many of the speeding cameras both in the UK and parts of this country are set to snap your picture if you exceed the posted limit by very little.  

And here in the US many of those cameras are operated by private companies that have contracts with local or state governments that allow them to keep a large percentage of any money collected by using their cameras.  I&#039;m sure many people here think that&#039;s great, but I have a problem with private companies enforcing public laws for their own enrichment.

&quot;Violent motorists?&quot;  Violence against what?  Cameras?  (I&#039;m not talking about the mailbombers here -- I mean the people who try to disable the cameras.  This has been an ongoing issue in the UK for a while now but it&#039;s the first time I&#039;ve heard about mailbombs.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure others are taking aim at other type of cameras.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dangerous&#8221; is a relative term.  Many of the speeding cameras both in the UK and parts of this country are set to snap your picture if you exceed the posted limit by very little.  </p>
<p>And here in the US many of those cameras are operated by private companies that have contracts with local or state governments that allow them to keep a large percentage of any money collected by using their cameras.  I&#8217;m sure many people here think that&#8217;s great, but I have a problem with private companies enforcing public laws for their own enrichment.</p>
<p>&#8220;Violent motorists?&#8221;  Violence against what?  Cameras?  (I&#8217;m not talking about the mailbombers here &#8212; I mean the people who try to disable the cameras.  This has been an ongoing issue in the UK for a while now but it&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve heard about mailbombs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABG</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28632</link>
		<dc:creator>ABG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28632</guid>
		<description>I think most of us here agree that the UK&#039;s obsession with security cameras is repulsive and shameful.  The problem is that these violent motorists aren&#039;t taking aim at any of the other security cameras - only the ones designed to catch dangerous speeders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of us here agree that the UK&#8217;s obsession with security cameras is repulsive and shameful.  The problem is that these violent motorists aren&#8217;t taking aim at any of the other security cameras &#8211; only the ones designed to catch dangerous speeders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud "non-killer motorist" Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28628</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud "non-killer motorist" Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28628</guid>
		<description>Nope, nobody&#039;s paying me.  I wish they were.

I only used jaywalking as an example because of the nature of this site and the proud pedestrians that inhabit these discussion boards.  But it could be anything -- do you want Big Brother taking your picture any time your toe goes over the line?  You&#039;d probably be broke, buried under a pile of tickets, and mighty angry.

Notice I made no mention of NYC&#039;s growing collection of red light cameras.  Running red lights is truly stupid and dangerous, and the vast majority of people obey red light laws because red light laws make sense.  But many speed limits don&#039;t make sense (not the fact that they exist, but the level they&#039;re set at).  Does anyone drive 50 mph on the Palisades Pkwy?  People don&#039;t respect laws that don&#039;t make sense.

That&#039;s why you jaywalk.  BTW, jaywalkers do kill -- themselves.  I&#039;m a non-rehabilitated jaywalker, having been busted by a very apologetic pair of New York&#039;s Finest during Giuliani&#039;s infamous crackdown on the &quot;Boulevard of Death.&quot;  Three hours in the Queens County Courthouse and $25 later I&#039;m proud to say that I still jaywalk every day.  

&quot;Hi, I&#039;m Spud and I&#039;m a jaywalker.&quot;

&quot;Hi, Spud!&quot;

(BTW, I like your choice of name for this thread.  It&#039;s OK if you change names because as long as you use the word &quot;argument&quot; I know it&#039;s the same person.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, nobody&#8217;s paying me.  I wish they were.</p>
<p>I only used jaywalking as an example because of the nature of this site and the proud pedestrians that inhabit these discussion boards.  But it could be anything &#8212; do you want Big Brother taking your picture any time your toe goes over the line?  You&#8217;d probably be broke, buried under a pile of tickets, and mighty angry.</p>
<p>Notice I made no mention of NYC&#8217;s growing collection of red light cameras.  Running red lights is truly stupid and dangerous, and the vast majority of people obey red light laws because red light laws make sense.  But many speed limits don&#8217;t make sense (not the fact that they exist, but the level they&#8217;re set at).  Does anyone drive 50 mph on the Palisades Pkwy?  People don&#8217;t respect laws that don&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why you jaywalk.  BTW, jaywalkers do kill &#8212; themselves.  I&#8217;m a non-rehabilitated jaywalker, having been busted by a very apologetic pair of New York&#8217;s Finest during Giuliani&#8217;s infamous crackdown on the &#8220;Boulevard of Death.&#8221;  Three hours in the Queens County Courthouse and $25 later I&#8217;m proud to say that I still jaywalk every day.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Hi, I&#8217;m Spud and I&#8217;m a jaywalker.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi, Spud!&#8221;</p>
<p>(BTW, I like your choice of name for this thread.  It&#8217;s OK if you change names because as long as you use the word &#8220;argument&#8221; I know it&#8217;s the same person.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killer jaywalker</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28612</link>
		<dc:creator>Killer jaywalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28612</guid>
		<description>The next time a jaywalker kills someone, we can talk about jaywalking enforcement cameras. But since we still don&#039;t have speed enforcement cameras, and we know speeding contributes to a big share of cycling and pedestrian deaths and serious injuries, why don&#039;t we hold off on equating jaywalkers with killer drivers?

Spud, I hope for your sake you are getting paid to foster these nonsensical arguements. Though if you are getting paid, I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s by Streetsblog to generate comments, or the deep pocketed dimwits who have warped our societal values so profoundly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next time a jaywalker kills someone, we can talk about jaywalking enforcement cameras. But since we still don&#8217;t have speed enforcement cameras, and we know speeding contributes to a big share of cycling and pedestrian deaths and serious injuries, why don&#8217;t we hold off on equating jaywalkers with killer drivers?</p>
<p>Spud, I hope for your sake you are getting paid to foster these nonsensical arguements. Though if you are getting paid, I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s by Streetsblog to generate comments, or the deep pocketed dimwits who have warped our societal values so profoundly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crzwdjk</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28559</link>
		<dc:creator>crzwdjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 05:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28559</guid>
		<description>I hear in Britain they now have cameras watching the speed cameras. What&#039;s next? Cameras watching those cameras?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear in Britain they now have cameras watching the speed cameras. What&#8217;s next? Cameras watching those cameras?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28519</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28519</guid>
		<description>Obviously I don&#039;t support the use of letter bombs or of anything meant to harm another individual.

But before anyone rails on Brits for destroying speeding cameras, ask yourself how you&#039;d feel if there were government cameras everywhere snapping pictures of you every time you broke the law.  All the proud pedestrians on this site probably jaywalk with abandon, even though it sometimes imperils themselves and others.  What would you do if you got a fine in the mail every time you failed to completely toe the line?

And this applies to the Brits in particular, since they have more surveillance cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world.  A backlash is inevitable (though letter bombs are not the way to about it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously I don&#8217;t support the use of letter bombs or of anything meant to harm another individual.</p>
<p>But before anyone rails on Brits for destroying speeding cameras, ask yourself how you&#8217;d feel if there were government cameras everywhere snapping pictures of you every time you broke the law.  All the proud pedestrians on this site probably jaywalk with abandon, even though it sometimes imperils themselves and others.  What would you do if you got a fine in the mail every time you failed to completely toe the line?</p>
<p>And this applies to the Brits in particular, since they have more surveillance cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world.  A backlash is inevitable (though letter bombs are not the way to about it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28413</link>
		<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28413</guid>
		<description>Perhaps there was a related motive for the tube bombings too?  They charge a fare to use that also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps there was a related motive for the tube bombings too?  They charge a fare to use that also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orcutt</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28411</link>
		<dc:creator>Orcutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28411</guid>
		<description>The NY Times today says two of the bombs were directed at outfits related to the London congestion charging program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NY Times today says two of the bombs were directed at outfits related to the London congestion charging program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28384</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28384</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood how speed limits, in places where motorists are the majority, could be so low that the majority feels compelled to break them. (Not that I&#039;m going to take up arms for speeding drivers any time soon.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood how speed limits, in places where motorists are the majority, could be so low that the majority feels compelled to break them. (Not that I&#8217;m going to take up arms for speeding drivers any time soon.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geter712</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28383</link>
		<dc:creator>Geter712</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28383</guid>
		<description>Hey people this is scene from Johny English movie!!!!!!!!!!!

I have recognized it!!!

Don&#039;t charge motorists they are just bunch of cool guys on bikes, go and hunt real criminals instead!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey people this is scene from Johny English movie!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>I have recognized it!!!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t charge motorists they are just bunch of cool guys on bikes, go and hunt real criminals instead!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StopLookThink</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28378</link>
		<dc:creator>StopLookThink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28378</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve all got to stop acting like rabid animals.If you&#039;re caught speeding you get what you deserve. The speed limits were not set as personal attacks against ANY citizen,but to assist in maintaining safety on the highways and in crowded cities. If a person is capable of violently destroying public property with no concern for passers-by who could be injured from such a blast,then one must scrutinize carefully deeper deficits in the morality of that person. I&#039;m not saying we should roll over and play dead when a law exists that a person or group of persons objects to, but violence in this case is not the way ,there are legal avenues to be pursued instead,and ultimatly such behaviour reduces the perpretator to the status of a common hoodlum. We need to get back to basics in terms of our morals and the standards we hold them to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve all got to stop acting like rabid animals.If you&#8217;re caught speeding you get what you deserve. The speed limits were not set as personal attacks against ANY citizen,but to assist in maintaining safety on the highways and in crowded cities. If a person is capable of violently destroying public property with no concern for passers-by who could be injured from such a blast,then one must scrutinize carefully deeper deficits in the morality of that person. I&#8217;m not saying we should roll over and play dead when a law exists that a person or group of persons objects to, but violence in this case is not the way ,there are legal avenues to be pursued instead,and ultimatly such behaviour reduces the perpretator to the status of a common hoodlum. We need to get back to basics in terms of our morals and the standards we hold them to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28368</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28368</guid>
		<description>I believe these incidents are destined to become more common as motorists resist having their entitlements stripped away by an increasingly aware public. If just asking them to obey a few laws is enough to stoke this level of violence, what will happen when non motorists, who are treated like second class citizens, begin to demand more public space which is safer and cleaner? I am not optimistic as to how this could unfold in America. The government, media, and corporate institutions have already taken their positions and the public realm is impoverished, leaving us with not much to lose. That is why they will resort to more direct violence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe these incidents are destined to become more common as motorists resist having their entitlements stripped away by an increasingly aware public. If just asking them to obey a few laws is enough to stoke this level of violence, what will happen when non motorists, who are treated like second class citizens, begin to demand more public space which is safer and cleaner? I am not optimistic as to how this could unfold in America. The government, media, and corporate institutions have already taken their positions and the public realm is impoverished, leaving us with not much to lose. That is why they will resort to more direct violence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfs</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/comment-page-1/#comment-28357</link>
		<dc:creator>mfs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/07/disgruntled-drivers-responsible-for-uk-letter-bombs/#comment-28357</guid>
		<description>Since people who vandalize SUVs are branded &quot;ecoterrorists&quot;, I propose we call these guy(s) &quot;petrolterrorists&quot; or &quot;petroterrorists&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since people who vandalize SUVs are branded &#8220;ecoterrorists&#8221;, I propose we call these guy(s) &#8220;petrolterrorists&#8221; or &#8220;petroterrorists&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

