<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live-Blogging the Manhattan Transpo Policy Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5926</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5926</guid>
		<description>EZ Rider. As much as I liked much of what Iris said and that it came straight from the Comissioner, perhaps they should let Wolloch or someone else with a little more passion deliver speeches like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EZ Rider. As much as I liked much of what Iris said and that it came straight from the Comissioner, perhaps they should let Wolloch or someone else with a little more passion deliver speeches like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5925</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5925</guid>
		<description>Back to Weinshall&#039;s improvements for a moment ---

Skeptics (like me) should take note of the scale of the Safe Routes to School improvements and the fact that DOT is putting them in the ground now --- I&#039;ve seen new &quot;speed limiters&quot; sprouting. It shows a great deal of urgency that DOT is not waiting to install them until all of the planning is done, or until the CBs sign-off on them. I hope DOT takes some credit for them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to Weinshall's improvements for a moment ---</p>
<p>Skeptics (like me) should take note of the scale of the Safe Routes to School improvements and the fact that DOT is putting them in the ground now --- I've seen new "speed limiters" sprouting. It shows a great deal of urgency that DOT is not waiting to install them until all of the planning is done, or until the CBs sign-off on them. I hope DOT takes some credit for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EZ Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5922</link>
		<dc:creator>EZ Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5922</guid>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;Glenn,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Iris&#039;s right-hand man David Wolloch were allowed to get up there and deliver the speech that he wrote himself, I&#039;m sure he would. With Iris, this stuff isn&#039;t from the heart, you know? She&#039;s just reading the text. She could just as well be reading about water tunnel improvements as DEP Commish.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn,</p>
<p>If Iris's right-hand man David Wolloch were allowed to get up there and deliver the speech that he wrote himself, I'm sure he would. With Iris, this stuff isn't from the heart, you know? She's just reading the text. She could just as well be reading about water tunnel improvements as DEP Commish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5921</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5921</guid>
		<description>One important difference that made Weinshall&#039;s presentation stand out was that all of her remarks  were made from a prepared text, while all the other speakers spoke directly to the audience. 

And no mention of Car free Central park...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One important difference that made Weinshall's presentation stand out was that all of her remarks  were made from a prepared text, while all the other speakers spoke directly to the audience. </p>
<p>And no mention of Car free Central park...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5915</guid>
		<description>Very slightly off-topic, but since people are reading, again I say convert just ONE on-street car parking space near the Bedford Ave. L station to an on-street bike parking space.  

Elderly people complaining about bikes on sidewalk?  Cyclists being harassed?  Both groups quickly made happier.

(And then, of course, repeat that over and over throughout the City.)  I mean, bikes are ROAD devices, aren&#039;t they?  Why shouldn&#039;t they, like   cars, be given the privilege of on-street space to stop, park, and lock up?  They&#039;re many, many times more space-efficient than cars! (Among 10,000 other reasons that cyclists deserve more privilege than motorists!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very slightly off-topic, but since people are reading, again I say convert just ONE on-street car parking space near the Bedford Ave. L station to an on-street bike parking space.  </p>
<p>Elderly people complaining about bikes on sidewalk?  Cyclists being harassed?  Both groups quickly made happier.</p>
<p>(And then, of course, repeat that over and over throughout the City.)  I mean, bikes are ROAD devices, aren't they?  Why shouldn't they, like   cars, be given the privilege of on-street space to stop, park, and lock up?  They're many, many times more space-efficient than cars! (Among 10,000 other reasons that cyclists deserve more privilege than motorists!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5914</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5914</guid>
		<description>Car-Free Central Park?

Did Weinshall mention it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Car-Free Central Park?</p>
<p>Did Weinshall mention it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5913</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5913</guid>
		<description>Part of me welcomes Weinshall&#039;s words as symbols of a new reality in which City Hall has awaken to the public clamor to fix the dysfunction that is NYC streets. In this new reality, DOT must at least pledge allegiance to a new order in which motorists are not the top of the heap. This part thinks that whether Weinshall is sincere or not matters less than the fact that she was compelled to say what she did.  

Another part of me notes that every transportation improvement Weinshal cited has been advocated for, planned for and debated at length, and been stuck in the DOT morass for ages. Many are a fraction of what they should be: to get so little from the Truck Route study is appalling, and won&#039;t provide relief; NYC style &quot;BRT&quot; may not be noticeable; Times Square ped improvements have been in the works for over a decade; the successful commercial congestion parking pricing is expanding at a slow pace. All this said, it&#039;s a start and better than the near total stagnation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of me welcomes Weinshall's words as symbols of a new reality in which City Hall has awaken to the public clamor to fix the dysfunction that is NYC streets. In this new reality, DOT must at least pledge allegiance to a new order in which motorists are not the top of the heap. This part thinks that whether Weinshall is sincere or not matters less than the fact that she was compelled to say what she did.  </p>
<p>Another part of me notes that every transportation improvement Weinshal cited has been advocated for, planned for and debated at length, and been stuck in the DOT morass for ages. Many are a fraction of what they should be: to get so little from the Truck Route study is appalling, and won't provide relief; NYC style "BRT" may not be noticeable; Times Square ped improvements have been in the works for over a decade; the successful commercial congestion parking pricing is expanding at a slow pace. All this said, it's a start and better than the near total stagnation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5904</guid>
		<description>Upon further reflection, I see Orcutt&#039;s point that this stuff is a departure for our DOT. I guess what I was reacting to was the presentation; it was not presented as a departure or an indictment of past priorities. If you didn&#039;t know better when listening to the talk, you&#039;d think the DOT had been coming up with stuff like this all along. 

To be fair, it&#039;s pretty normal to not criticize oneself (or one&#039;s agency) in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further reflection, I see Orcutt's point that this stuff is a departure for our DOT. I guess what I was reacting to was the presentation; it was not presented as a departure or an indictment of past priorities. If you didn't know better when listening to the talk, you'd think the DOT had been coming up with stuff like this all along. </p>
<p>To be fair, it's pretty normal to not criticize oneself (or one's agency) in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5903</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5903</guid>
		<description>Good points someguy. I think it won&#039;t be as bad for Broadway in the 30s as you might think. Seventh Avenue in the 50s is pretty light on traffic. Unlike Broadway which comes down from Upper Manhattan, Seventh is blocked by Central Park. Yes, it is an exit from the Park Drive, but that doesn&#039;t have that much traffic on it (and shouldn&#039;t have &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt;). I think that once drivers realize that they can&#039;t take Seventh Avenue anymore unless they want to get shuffled over to narrow two-lane Broadway, they&#039;ll shift their patterns over and take Broadway in the 50s instead of Seventh.

As an employee in Times Square for six years, I can heartily say that &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; more sidewalk or median space in Times Square is to be incredibly welcomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points someguy. I think it won't be as bad for Broadway in the 30s as you might think. Seventh Avenue in the 50s is pretty light on traffic. Unlike Broadway which comes down from Upper Manhattan, Seventh is blocked by Central Park. Yes, it is an exit from the Park Drive, but that doesn't have that much traffic on it (and shouldn't have <i>any</i>). I think that once drivers realize that they can't take Seventh Avenue anymore unless they want to get shuffled over to narrow two-lane Broadway, they'll shift their patterns over and take Broadway in the 50s instead of Seventh.</p>
<p>As an employee in Times Square for six years, I can heartily say that <i>any</i> more sidewalk or median space in Times Square is to be incredibly welcomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someguy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5900</link>
		<dc:creator>someguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5900</guid>
		<description>To be fair, there are downsides to the Times Square &quot;Shuffle&quot;.  I believe 7th Ave gets more traffic and now that traffic will be forced down Broadway.  What does that mean for the people advocating for a car-free Broadway if we are now putting MORE cars on Broadway?  How does this impact the significant sidewalk expansions DOT is implementing soon at Herald Square - will they be jeopardized by worse traffic conditions being introduced into that equation?  Will the new pedestrian space at 45th St in Times Square really be useable, or will it be so narrow that it will just be a dangerous &quot;cattle chute&quot;?  Will the inside islands of Times Square no longer be mellow refuges among all the din and now just another place with pedestrians jostling to get through - will there be anywhere to rest and take in Times Square for tourists?  Just some things to consider.  There might have been legitimate reasons why closing the bowtie wasn&#039;t initially the preferred option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, there are downsides to the Times Square "Shuffle".  I believe 7th Ave gets more traffic and now that traffic will be forced down Broadway.  What does that mean for the people advocating for a car-free Broadway if we are now putting MORE cars on Broadway?  How does this impact the significant sidewalk expansions DOT is implementing soon at Herald Square - will they be jeopardized by worse traffic conditions being introduced into that equation?  Will the new pedestrian space at 45th St in Times Square really be useable, or will it be so narrow that it will just be a dangerous "cattle chute"?  Will the inside islands of Times Square no longer be mellow refuges among all the din and now just another place with pedestrians jostling to get through - will there be anywhere to rest and take in Times Square for tourists?  Just some things to consider.  There might have been legitimate reasons why closing the bowtie wasn't initially the preferred option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>Thanks folks. This is a &lt;i&gt;great&lt;/i&gt; move, following up on the DOT&#039;s improvements to Herald Square some five years ago now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks folks. This is a <i>great</i> move, following up on the DOT's improvements to Herald Square some five years ago now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5895</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5895</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also just a one year test, not necessarily permanent. I&#039;m all for experiments and proving they work. Weinshall omitted the bike lane segment  being eliminated. They should connect the broadway bike lane down Seventh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's also just a one year test, not necessarily permanent. I'm all for experiments and proving they work. Weinshall omitted the bike lane segment  being eliminated. They should connect the broadway bike lane down Seventh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orcutt</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator>Orcutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5894</guid>
		<description>The item here describes the change - it basically eliminates the option to stay on 7th, and apparently a bike lane segment too:

http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/10/08/times_square_is.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The item here describes the change - it basically eliminates the option to stay on 7th, and apparently a bike lane segment too:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/10/08/times_square_is.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/10/08/times_square_is.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5893</link>
		<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5893</guid>
		<description>AD:

Visualize this:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/10082006/photos/news003.jpg

(Post&#039;s story is here:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/10082006/news/regionalnews/times_sq__a_changin_with_new_traffic_plan_regionalnews_angela_montefinise.htm
)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AD:</p>
<p>Visualize this:<br />
<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/10082006/photos/news003.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/seven/10082006/photos/news003.jpg</a></p>
<p>(Post's story is here:<br />
<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/10082006/news/regionalnews/times_sq__a_changin_with_new_traffic_plan_regionalnews_angela_montefinise.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/seven/10082006/news/regionalnews/times_sq__a_changin_with_new_traffic_plan_regionalnews_angela_montefinise.htm</a><br />
)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>Somebody help me visualize this. From Aaron&#039;s report: &quot;After the closure, cars traveling down 7th Avenue will be forced to continue down Broadway. Vehicles traveling down 7th Avenue will have to continue down Broadway. This entire middle section of Times Square will be given over to pedestrians.&quot;

Right now, IIRC, traffic coming from Broadway is forced to continue on Seventh, and traffic from Seventh has the option taking Broadway or Seventh. Both avenues converge precisely at 45th Street. I&#039;m having trouble visualizing how they&#039;re going to add space for peds at that intersection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody help me visualize this. From Aaron's report: "After the closure, cars traveling down 7th Avenue will be forced to continue down Broadway. Vehicles traveling down 7th Avenue will have to continue down Broadway. This entire middle section of Times Square will be given over to pedestrians."</p>
<p>Right now, IIRC, traffic coming from Broadway is forced to continue on Seventh, and traffic from Seventh has the option taking Broadway or Seventh. Both avenues converge precisely at 45th Street. I'm having trouble visualizing how they're going to add space for peds at that intersection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orcutt</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>Orcutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>I thought the Commissioner&#039;s speech was a departure for city DOT both in terms of language used and in the packaging together of a set of reform policies.  It could be an indication that the problem of planning for a future NYC of 9 million is starting to concretely impact city policy.  

The commissioner said DOT would:

* Soon announce 5 bus rapid transit corridors, with accelerated construction (starting in fall 2007) on two of them.  She also said NYC&#039;s BRT system could become the world&#039;s most extensive.

* Implement the bikeway initiative, much discussed elsewhere in this blog.

* Implement policies from its truck route study including nighttime restrictions in neighborhoods and work with local NYPD precincts on wayward truck problems - no time frame.

* Expand muni-meter curbside parking pricing south in Midtown from 33rd to 23rd Street.

* Lower Manhattan study to look in detail at optimal use of curb space.  Would this contain potential to recommend or reinforce reining in of privileged parking or ousting of curbside parking in some areas for bus and bike lanes, or wider sidewalks?

* Starting capital work stemming from Safe Routes to Schools studies - anticipates installation of 750 neckdowns and 70 medians in first round of work among other features.

* A program to &quot;boldly reimagine&quot; city streetscapes and pursue &quot;aggressive pedestrianization&quot; building from the Willoughby Street reclamation in Brooklyn and similar projects planned for Astor Place, 1st Avenue along Stuyvesant Town and at a site downtown whose name I failed to catch, to proliferate &quot;neighborhood plazas&quot; around the five boroughs.  

* In major pedestrian areas like Herald and Times Square, build out permanent sidewalk infrastructure to the lines marked by paint and temporary bollards, and change Times Sq. traffic pattern to reclaim even more walking space as Aaron indicates above.

* The DOT is setting up a new office of strategic planning to develop long range ideas in these regards, to be run by Steve Weber, who has handled post-9/11 lower Manhattan planning for the agency and before that worked at Regional Plan Association on a variety of transit-related projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Commissioner's speech was a departure for city DOT both in terms of language used and in the packaging together of a set of reform policies.  It could be an indication that the problem of planning for a future NYC of 9 million is starting to concretely impact city policy.  </p>
<p>The commissioner said DOT would:</p>
<p>* Soon announce 5 bus rapid transit corridors, with accelerated construction (starting in fall 2007) on two of them.  She also said NYC's BRT system could become the world's most extensive.</p>
<p>* Implement the bikeway initiative, much discussed elsewhere in this blog.</p>
<p>* Implement policies from its truck route study including nighttime restrictions in neighborhoods and work with local NYPD precincts on wayward truck problems - no time frame.</p>
<p>* Expand muni-meter curbside parking pricing south in Midtown from 33rd to 23rd Street.</p>
<p>* Lower Manhattan study to look in detail at optimal use of curb space.  Would this contain potential to recommend or reinforce reining in of privileged parking or ousting of curbside parking in some areas for bus and bike lanes, or wider sidewalks?</p>
<p>* Starting capital work stemming from Safe Routes to Schools studies - anticipates installation of 750 neckdowns and 70 medians in first round of work among other features.</p>
<p>* A program to "boldly reimagine" city streetscapes and pursue "aggressive pedestrianization" building from the Willoughby Street reclamation in Brooklyn and similar projects planned for Astor Place, 1st Avenue along Stuyvesant Town and at a site downtown whose name I failed to catch, to proliferate "neighborhood plazas" around the five boroughs.  </p>
<p>* In major pedestrian areas like Herald and Times Square, build out permanent sidewalk infrastructure to the lines marked by paint and temporary bollards, and change Times Sq. traffic pattern to reclaim even more walking space as Aaron indicates above.</p>
<p>* The DOT is setting up a new office of strategic planning to develop long range ideas in these regards, to be run by Steve Weber, who has handled post-9/11 lower Manhattan planning for the agency and before that worked at Regional Plan Association on a variety of transit-related projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5887</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5887</guid>
		<description>Other specifics mentioned by Iris:
-five corridors to test BRT [insert sexier name please] by fall 2007
-expansion of Midtown pay-for-parking area south to 23rd, east to 2nd, west to 9th (?)
-installation of neckdowns and medians galore in conjunction with first round of Safe Routes to Schools improvements
-reallocation of street space to create more public plazas in all five boros (a la Willoughby Street in BK)

She also said that protecting peds (or maybe it was preventing ped fatalities?) is DOT&#039;s #1 priority, and that there is a need to reduce auto use. She said she was excited about the new office of strategic planning within DOT.

Still, all in all, her speech didn&#039;t seem to question the status quo. I thought that Stringer painted a much less rosy picture and suggested the need for more radical change, setting up Enrique to provide more vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other specifics mentioned by Iris:<br />
-five corridors to test BRT [insert sexier name please] by fall 2007<br />
-expansion of Midtown pay-for-parking area south to 23rd, east to 2nd, west to 9th (?)<br />
-installation of neckdowns and medians galore in conjunction with first round of Safe Routes to Schools improvements<br />
-reallocation of street space to create more public plazas in all five boros (a la Willoughby Street in BK)</p>
<p>She also said that protecting peds (or maybe it was preventing ped fatalities?) is DOT's #1 priority, and that there is a need to reduce auto use. She said she was excited about the new office of strategic planning within DOT.</p>
<p>Still, all in all, her speech didn't seem to question the status quo. I thought that Stringer painted a much less rosy picture and suggested the need for more radical change, setting up Enrique to provide more vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5886</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5886</guid>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;I love his line about a street not being bike-friendly unless an 8-year-old child can ride  along it safely. Yeah, thanks Aaron - great stuff.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love his line about a street not being bike-friendly unless an 8-year-old child can ride  along it safely. Yeah, thanks Aaron - great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-5884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/10/12/live-blogging-the-manhattan-transpo-conference/#comment-5884</guid>
		<description>Wow. really great news about Times Square. and thanks for transcribing Penalosa&#039;s speech. he&#039;s as good as it gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. really great news about Times Square. and thanks for transcribing Penalosa's speech. he's as good as it gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
