<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rally for Houston Street Buffered Bike Lanes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHOBIADDICT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Misery Index - Weekend Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>PHOBIADDICT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Misery Index - Weekend Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Boulevard of Death&#8221; rally planned [StreetsBlog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Boulevard of Death&#8221; rally planned [StreetsBlog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>Frank - While I mostly agree with you assessment, I have seen much improvement just over the last year and there are significant differences across the city based on local interest, political input and community board requests. So don&#039;t think it&#039;s impossible - you can have an impact on specific requests if you do the hard work necessary with your local community boards and neighborhood / block associations. 

But you are right that it&#039;s unfortunate that we have to go block by block, neighborhood by neighborhood to accomplish basic goals like increased safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8211; While I mostly agree with you assessment, I have seen much improvement just over the last year and there are significant differences across the city based on local interest, political input and community board requests. So don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s impossible &#8211; you can have an impact on specific requests if you do the hard work necessary with your local community boards and neighborhood / block associations. </p>
<p>But you are right that it&#8217;s unfortunate that we have to go block by block, neighborhood by neighborhood to accomplish basic goals like increased safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2006/08/25/rally-for-houston-street-buffered-bike-lanes/#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bad that all we can do is &quot;ask the DOT&quot; to make these changes. It&#039;s too bad that this is the only lever we have to move this big, fat, lethargic, ass-covering, bureaucracy. The DOT has monopolistic control over the city&#039;s streets. Like any monopoly, DOT has no incentive to innovate or move quickly. It has no competition. Nothing pushing it that it can&#039;t readily ignore. The main driving force within DOT is to protect itself against law suits and complaints. Maybe we need a bunch of little DOT&#039;s competing with each other to make the best and most functional streets, rather than this one gigantic, non-moving, useless, monopolistic behemoth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad that all we can do is &#8220;ask the DOT&#8221; to make these changes. It&#8217;s too bad that this is the only lever we have to move this big, fat, lethargic, ass-covering, bureaucracy. The DOT has monopolistic control over the city&#8217;s streets. Like any monopoly, DOT has no incentive to innovate or move quickly. It has no competition. Nothing pushing it that it can&#8217;t readily ignore. The main driving force within DOT is to protect itself against law suits and complaints. Maybe we need a bunch of little DOT&#8217;s competing with each other to make the best and most functional streets, rather than this one gigantic, non-moving, useless, monopolistic behemoth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

